The whole world is in pain over the completed suicide of Robin
Williams. Robin was very sick and despite reaching out for help
countless times, he wasn't able to find the help he needed. I'd like to
talk about suicide and some thoughts about it.
Have you ever
been dumped by someone and found solace in a torchy break-up song?
Breaking up with someone can hurt so much that you think no one else
could possibly understand how you feel. But break-up songs understand,
they feel your pain, they say exactly what you are thinking and
feeling, they don't say the wrong things and they comfort you because
they resonate with you.
In Dusty Springfield's song "You Don't Have To Say You Love Me" she desperately sings;
Don't you see that now you've gone
And I'm left here on my own
And that I have to follow you
And beg you to come home
You don't have to say you love me
Just be close at hand
You don't have to stay forever
I will understand
Phil Collins sings in "Take A Look At Me Now;"
So take a look at me now, oh there's just an empty space
And there's nothing left here to remind me,
just the memory of your face
Ooh take a look at me now, well there's just an empty space
And you coming back to me is against all odds and that's what I've got to face
I wish I could just make you turn around,
turn around and see me cry
There's so much I need to say to you,
so many reasons why
You're the only one who really knew me at all
Who
hasn't felt those feelings over a love lost? If we have, how many of
us have found a comfort in those songs and listened to them over and
over simply because they explored our feelings?
Henri Nouwen
once said, "The friend who can be silent with us in a moment of despair
or confusion, who can stay with us in an hour of grief and bereavement,
who can tolerate not knowing... not healing, not curing... that is a
friend who cares."
When someone is thinking about suicide,
chances are they want to talk about it, about their feelings, about
their pain. They just don't know how to start the conversation and most
certainly, many of us don't know how to, either. It is very easy to
say the wrong thing and many people do.
Every fifteen minutes,
someone in this country completes suicide. Many have given warning
signals and have even reached out for help but all too often the people
they reached out to may not have been listening. It's not their fault,
they just don't know how to listen or are uncomfortable with the topic.
We
should never be afraid to talk about suicide because the person
thinking about it isn't and we need to engage them and encourage them to
talk. Getting them to talk means listening to them. Re-read the
Henri Nouwen quote. That is how you listen, by not talking.
For
example, if someone is depressed because they lost their job, here are
some things NOT to say: You'll find another one; I lost a job once;
You're better off not working for them; I know someone who is hiring;
I'm sorry; Get over it; I know exactly how you feel; it's only a job;
You'll be able to collect unemployment now; How dare they, you should
write them a nasty letter; What did you do wrong?
Instead, with
careful listening, like a good torch song, you should steer them into
their pain where they can explore that pain. You can achieve this by
asking questions. These questions will get them to talk about their
pain and like a good torch song, help them to understand their own
feelings and heal.
So someone tells us that they lost their
job. You can ask, "How have you been dealing with that?" An open ended
question such as that will get them to talk further about how they are
feeling. Again talking about their issue is for them, not you. They
may pause and the silence may be uncomfortable for many of us but resist
the urge to fill the uncomfortable silence. Re-read Henri Nouwen's
quote. In that silence, they may be thinking and feeling and working
through how they are feeling and your discomfort and urge to fill in the
silence could destroy all that. Be patient and silent and present.
If they are not responding, here are some other questions you may ask:
What is most difficult about losing your job?
Tell me what happened.
Tell me more about that.
What is it you want from your job?
How do you feel about what happened?
Do you feel comfortable talking to me about this?
Have you told anyone about how you are feeling?
What do you think you can do?
What may stand in your way?
These
kinds of questions establish rapport and define the problem. Your job
is to guide them or steer them into the pain. If you can't find a
question to ask, there are statements you can make which may spur their
thoughts and conversation:
Say more about what happened.
It sounds like you are going through a difficult time.
I can see why you feel that way.
Take your time, I'm here to listen and support you.
After
exploring feelings, don't be afraid to ask the suicide question. If
they are not thinking about suicide, there is no harm done. If they
are, chances are they will be willing to talk about it. This is very
important because if they are willing to talk about it, it is because
they are ambivalent and your talk, honesty and presence can actually
save their life.
Go ahead and ask questions like:
Have you been thinking about suicide?
Do you have a plan?
Do you know how you would do it?
Do you have the means to act on your plan?
Do you have a time set for doing this?
If
they answer "yes" to any of those questions, help is critical. If you
can get them to give you or lock away the means (drugs, gun, knife,
rope) that is what is called a protective factor. The point is to get
them through the moment. If you can get them to live another day,
tomorrow they may feel different.
While answering a local
suicide hotline, I discerned that the caller was safe for the night
because she locked her gun in a box and put it in the basement. I made
her promise to call me tomorrow to let me know how she was doing. She
did. She told me the only reason she didn't go back down into the
basement to retrieve her gun and kill herself was because she promised
to call me back the next day and she wanted to keep that promise. At
the very least, I got her through the moment and to live another day.
While speaking with her the next day she made a comment to her cat which
jumped on her lap. I asked her what would happen to her cat if she
were not around anymore and she paused for a moment and said, "I don't
know. I could never leave my cat alone." The cat was another
protective factor. A very powerful one. She had a reason to live.
Before
leaving someone, we need to make sure they will be safe. We can
achieve this by exploring their protective factors and distracting
activities. Getting someone to prepare a meal, go shopping, take their
dog for a walk, cuddle with their cat, take a shower, take a nap, draw,
write, watch TV or exercise, we are giving them a plan which can be
enough to get them through the day.
"The friend who can be
silent with us in a moment of despair or confusion, who can stay with us
in an hour of grief and bereavement, who can tolerate not knowing...
not healing, not curing... that is a friend who cares."
-Henri Nouwen.
Musician Malcolm Kogut has been tickling the ivories since he was 14 and won the NPM DMMD Musician of the Year award in 99. He has CDs along with many published books. Malcolm played in the pit for many Broadway touring shows. When away from the keyboard, he loves exploring the nooks, crannies and arresting beauty of the Adirondack Mountains, battling gravity on the ski slopes and roller coasters.
Tuesday, August 12, 2014
Monday, August 11, 2014
Facebook Stalking
Senator Chuck Schumer is at it again. Whenever something happens in the
world somehow Mr. Schumer will find a way to propose a law about it.
For instance, last month when a Malaysia Airline was shot down over the
Ukraine, Schumer suggested that we equip our commercial airlines with
anti-missile defenses so that an event like that doesn't happen here.
Remember when Avonte Oquendo, the boy with autism whose remains were
found after he disappeared at age 14 from his school in October?
Senator Schumer proposed “Avonte’s Law,” which would place electronic
tracking devices to be worn by children with autism. My sister raised
an autistic child and never lost her once. That was just good
parenting. My own mom had a lucrative career building bombs while
working at the arsenal. When she had her first child she quit to become
a stay at home mom. We may not have had two cars and steak for dinner
every night but no new legislation was required for my mom to raise four
kids.
This weeks Schumerian target are those ubiquitous wristband fitness devices. There are dozens of them on the market and Senator Schumer has targeted Fitbit. He claims that these wrist pedometers are a "privacy nightmare" and that they collect personal information on your health, sleep, and location - information which should be just that – personal. Without doing his research, Schumer opined that Fitbit will sell your personal information. Fitbit responded with; "Fitbit does not sell user data. Our privacy policy prevents us from doing this. We are committed to our users' privacy and welcome the opportunity to work with Senator Schumer on this important issue." Alas, it is too late for Fitbit. Just google "privacy nightmare." I wonder why Schumer didn't target other giants of the industry such as Nike or Garmin.
Most users of these fitness devices eagerly and willingly register these tools and freely upload their information for the world to see. Personally, I would register the device under a fake name for I don't want the world to see how lazy I am. Actually, I am not lazy but as a piano player, I spend much of my time sitting lifelessly at either the piano or computer. I also spend an enormous amount of time practicing away from the piano either on my sofa or in a deck chair by the pool. You may think that I'm napping but in reality I am working very studiously at composing, memorization and improvising.
If Mr. Schumer is truly concerned about our privacy, especially the personal information many of us freely post about ourselves, maybe he should look into Facebook.
When I was a kid I had a neighbor who was always looking out her window watching us kids play. I would look over to her house to see the curtains rustle as she hid from view. In college, every kid in the dorm practiced the art of voyeurism. A friend of mine admitted that she was always watching the man next door and it bothered her conscience when she was caught lustily watching him.
If we knew someone was stalking us and gathering information on us, it would certainly creep us out. Our personal information is none of their business. So how come we are accepting of people using Facebook to cyberstalk us? The answer is simple; we do it to other people ourselves.
Facebook serves as a covert method of investigation and discovering a wealth of information about people we don't actually know. Every time we meet someone new, one of the first things we will do is look them up on Facebook in order to learn everything about them and even "friend" them to get more. We want to know who their parents and siblings are, what they have been up to lately, where they live, where they vacation, who their friends are, where they work, how old they are, who they are they dating, status updates, photo uploads, photo tags, photo comments, wall posts, friend additions, group memberships, attended events, mutual friends, where they may have commented and what they "like." Facebook doesn't have the physical elements of being stalked in the real world, such as being followed or watched but the ulterior motive is just the same and just as real.
Online stalking may also consist of people communicating with you in ways that unsettle you (whether purposefully intended or unknowingly), especially with respect to suggesting or implying that they're watching and noting your every comment and update. Peter Baterip was accused of stalking an ex girlfriend and contacting her on Facebook using a fake identity over the course of 18 months. There have been numerous stories of teens (and adults posing as teens) who bully and harass people to the point of the victims even completing suicide in some cases. Many employers take to Facebook to gather information about their employees. One local man was fired from his job when he called in sick but later posted a selfie of himself at a baseball game on Facebook. His boss was one of his "friends." There was a Roman Catholic priest in TX who was accused of Facebook stalking. There was nothing wrong with that except all his stalkees were teenage boys in his parish. Without committing a crime, he was removed from active ministry.
Facebook stalking, like regular stalking, allows the stalker to secretly gather information about the person they are interested in. Facebook stalking is less likely to have an illegal component and is generally accepted by it's voyeuristic victims. The argument being, that if you didn't want others to know about your life, you wouldn't post it all over the internet. But, the real reason is that - we all do it and don't feel we are being voyeuristic about it. That's actually called denial. Maybe we are not willing to look into the abyss because we are afraid what will be staring back at us. I don't know, does the shoe fit?
Have you ever searched Facebook for someone you dated like fifteen years ago? Have you ever searched Facebook for high school friends to see who aged better, or who has the better job, who went bald, who got fat or who married whom? Stalking has become a perfectly normal activity. So you searched an ex-lover or new acquaintance on Facebook, who cares? If a neighbor watches you out his window or takes a photo of you, why is that different or worse?
Does Schumer know about Facebook stalking? Sure he does but no one will ever do anything about it because we all do it, so that makes it okay. After it was discovered that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was the Boston Bomber, his Facebook page received millions of hits within hours before it was taken down. But, not before people took snapshots of his pages and downloaded all the data. Nothing creepy about that. Do you want to see his pages? Sure you do. Just go to Google Images and search "Dzhokhar Tsarnaev facebook page." Want to see who his friends are? Sure you do. Want to see him shirtless? Sure you do. Nothing creepy here because, *you* are doing it and not some creepy person or organization you don't know, such as Fitbit. Unlike Fitbit, I wonder if Facebook sells your personal information . . . ? Does Schumer know about this?
PS, if you are lonely or bored, turn off Facebook and go outside to meet real people. A high-five is much healthier than a poke. A real friend is much more healthier than a "friend."
This weeks Schumerian target are those ubiquitous wristband fitness devices. There are dozens of them on the market and Senator Schumer has targeted Fitbit. He claims that these wrist pedometers are a "privacy nightmare" and that they collect personal information on your health, sleep, and location - information which should be just that – personal. Without doing his research, Schumer opined that Fitbit will sell your personal information. Fitbit responded with; "Fitbit does not sell user data. Our privacy policy prevents us from doing this. We are committed to our users' privacy and welcome the opportunity to work with Senator Schumer on this important issue." Alas, it is too late for Fitbit. Just google "privacy nightmare." I wonder why Schumer didn't target other giants of the industry such as Nike or Garmin.
Most users of these fitness devices eagerly and willingly register these tools and freely upload their information for the world to see. Personally, I would register the device under a fake name for I don't want the world to see how lazy I am. Actually, I am not lazy but as a piano player, I spend much of my time sitting lifelessly at either the piano or computer. I also spend an enormous amount of time practicing away from the piano either on my sofa or in a deck chair by the pool. You may think that I'm napping but in reality I am working very studiously at composing, memorization and improvising.
If Mr. Schumer is truly concerned about our privacy, especially the personal information many of us freely post about ourselves, maybe he should look into Facebook.
When I was a kid I had a neighbor who was always looking out her window watching us kids play. I would look over to her house to see the curtains rustle as she hid from view. In college, every kid in the dorm practiced the art of voyeurism. A friend of mine admitted that she was always watching the man next door and it bothered her conscience when she was caught lustily watching him.
If we knew someone was stalking us and gathering information on us, it would certainly creep us out. Our personal information is none of their business. So how come we are accepting of people using Facebook to cyberstalk us? The answer is simple; we do it to other people ourselves.
Facebook serves as a covert method of investigation and discovering a wealth of information about people we don't actually know. Every time we meet someone new, one of the first things we will do is look them up on Facebook in order to learn everything about them and even "friend" them to get more. We want to know who their parents and siblings are, what they have been up to lately, where they live, where they vacation, who their friends are, where they work, how old they are, who they are they dating, status updates, photo uploads, photo tags, photo comments, wall posts, friend additions, group memberships, attended events, mutual friends, where they may have commented and what they "like." Facebook doesn't have the physical elements of being stalked in the real world, such as being followed or watched but the ulterior motive is just the same and just as real.
Online stalking may also consist of people communicating with you in ways that unsettle you (whether purposefully intended or unknowingly), especially with respect to suggesting or implying that they're watching and noting your every comment and update. Peter Baterip was accused of stalking an ex girlfriend and contacting her on Facebook using a fake identity over the course of 18 months. There have been numerous stories of teens (and adults posing as teens) who bully and harass people to the point of the victims even completing suicide in some cases. Many employers take to Facebook to gather information about their employees. One local man was fired from his job when he called in sick but later posted a selfie of himself at a baseball game on Facebook. His boss was one of his "friends." There was a Roman Catholic priest in TX who was accused of Facebook stalking. There was nothing wrong with that except all his stalkees were teenage boys in his parish. Without committing a crime, he was removed from active ministry.
Facebook stalking, like regular stalking, allows the stalker to secretly gather information about the person they are interested in. Facebook stalking is less likely to have an illegal component and is generally accepted by it's voyeuristic victims. The argument being, that if you didn't want others to know about your life, you wouldn't post it all over the internet. But, the real reason is that - we all do it and don't feel we are being voyeuristic about it. That's actually called denial. Maybe we are not willing to look into the abyss because we are afraid what will be staring back at us. I don't know, does the shoe fit?
Have you ever searched Facebook for someone you dated like fifteen years ago? Have you ever searched Facebook for high school friends to see who aged better, or who has the better job, who went bald, who got fat or who married whom? Stalking has become a perfectly normal activity. So you searched an ex-lover or new acquaintance on Facebook, who cares? If a neighbor watches you out his window or takes a photo of you, why is that different or worse?
Does Schumer know about Facebook stalking? Sure he does but no one will ever do anything about it because we all do it, so that makes it okay. After it was discovered that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was the Boston Bomber, his Facebook page received millions of hits within hours before it was taken down. But, not before people took snapshots of his pages and downloaded all the data. Nothing creepy about that. Do you want to see his pages? Sure you do. Just go to Google Images and search "Dzhokhar Tsarnaev facebook page." Want to see who his friends are? Sure you do. Want to see him shirtless? Sure you do. Nothing creepy here because, *you* are doing it and not some creepy person or organization you don't know, such as Fitbit. Unlike Fitbit, I wonder if Facebook sells your personal information . . . ? Does Schumer know about this?
PS, if you are lonely or bored, turn off Facebook and go outside to meet real people. A high-five is much healthier than a poke. A real friend is much more healthier than a "friend."
Labels:
facebook,
law,
malcolm kogut,
schumer,
stalk
Saturday, August 9, 2014
Embrace Failure
It is impossible to argue with someone who knows more than you do. During the intermission of a show where I was the pianist, a young man came up to me saying that he came to the show just to watch me play. He went on to disclose that he knew I had healed myself of tendonitis, an affliction which he was currently suffering from and he wanted to see me play for himself and talk to me about how I healed. The conductor was listening in and immediately chimed in with his opinion on the matter. He began by saying that he had a doctorate in piano pedagogy and trained with some names of people whom I never heard of. He opined that our injured inquirer needed to work through his pain, build endurance and do strengthening exercises to overcome his malady. He couldn't be more wrong and since the injured pianist was giving him ear, I quietly slipped away.
The truth is that it doesn't take very much strength nor endurance to play the piano. The fallacy here is that a lot of pianist feel that the keys are heavy and they need more muscle to dig into the keys. Everything we need we are born with and our everyday movement is enough to equip us with all the muscle we actually need. To play properly it is more a matter of what not to do. For instance, it doesn't require strength to depress a key, only a small amount of arm weight. When a pianist feels they need to play harder to get the keys down, that is actually a symptom of a dual muscular pull - they are using two diverse muscles to make the hand or fingers to go in two directions at the same time which makes them feel weak. The muscles are fighting one another to move the bones. A dual muscular pull will cause tension, pain and fatigue which is not an issue of endurance or strength but, poor technique and lack of knowledge.
Go to a piano and press down a key, notice that it doesn't take very much strength to make the key go down, nor a lot of weight. Notice also that after you reach the point of sound, when the note plays, the key rests on the key bed. A mistake a lot of pianists make is to play into that key bed. No matter how hard they play, once the key reaches that key bed, no amount of pressure is going to make more sound nor make playing easier. The sound has already been made. Go ahead and play a note, then press into the key bed as hard as you can. You will probably feel fatigue and pain. The solution to the fatigue and pain you are now feeling is to allow only enough weight to play the key to it's point of sound, then no more. Many educated pianists will say that it is impossible to play to the point of sound but that is because they can't do it. In that case, they are correct. It can't be done, by them.
Every motion requires an equal and opposite motion. As you sit at a keyboard, rest your hands on the keys. If your arms are totally relaxed, your hands should fall off the keys and dangle to your side. The body wasn't designed to sit in that static position but it can overcome it by forward shifting, shaping and playing with rounded motions which are all equal and opposite to playing down. Many pianists attack the instrument with brute force because they don't know what effortless playing feels like, so instead they force themselves to feel effortless with strength and endurance. What they are really doing is training the body to accept fatigue and as my doctorate friend said, build strength and endurance to fight through it. Fighting tension with tension is a no win situation. If you play using natural arm weight, you won't be using muscles to the point of fatigue by pressing into the key bed in the first place.
Let's look at body building. Many people who go to gyms and work out on machines which are only isolating certain muscles. Stand barefoot on one leg (if you can) and look down at your ankle. You should see dozens of tendons and muscles come into play in an effort to maintain balance. Chances are that you've never isolated and trained each of those individual muscles but, your everyday normal motion is enough exercise and maintain those muscles. Normal and beneficial activity incorporates many muscles at once. To exercise your ankles or legs on a machine, the machine will exercise one specific muscle and both legs at the same time because that is how these machines are designed. Exercising each body part separately but whole would be better.
If someone were to bench press with a single bar with weights on both sides, both arms will assist in the balance and pressing of the bar. If that person were to use two separate dumbbells, each arm will have to engage all the ancillary muscles to adjust and maintain balance, just like your ankle did. Going to gyms and working on those machines can be a waste of time. It would be better to work with free weights. Free weights are also more demanding of the core so it is like exercising more body parts at one time. You can't get that whole body workout on a machine designed to isolate a muscle.
Strength and endurance have little functional value in playing the piano just as weight lifting doesn't in our everyday lives. If I can bench 350 pounds but work at a desk five days a week, all that training is of no value to real life. The performance demands in our every day life consists mainly of manipulating our own body around desks and computers and pushing pencils. When is the last time you exerted yourself while writing a memo or reading a report?
Okay, working out makes you look good. That's another issue best discussed with your mental health provider.
Working out makes you feel good. Actually, getting adequate sleep, eating a proper diet and drinking plenty of water makes you feel good. I've worked out before and to be honest, I did not feel good the next day.
There are two kinds of pain; there is the kind with lactic acid build up where swelling occurs when muscles tissue is torn and the body rushes oxygenated blood to the site in order to repair it (good) and pain from strain and stress on bone, ligaments and tendons (bad). Pressing into a key bed strains the bone, ligaments and tendons.
Ligaments hold our bones together. If you bend a bone or hyper-extend a joint beyond what is normal, you can tear or stretch a ligament. This is bad since they don't grow back. This happens often to football players, basketball players and skiers because their foot and knee alignment don't line up. One goes one way, the other goes another and the ligament in between bears the brunt of the misaligned torque. A third degree tear of a ligament can only be repaired with surgery. A first and second degree tear can either be tolerated or it may "scar down" but you will lose flexibility. For a professional athlete it might be better to have a third degree tear so that a surgeon can graft a new one in its place. That happened to me and my repaired knee is now stronger than my good knee.
Tendons move our bones around. When you stress a joint to the point of stretching or tearing a tendon, this too is bad since they can take years to heal. Tendons do not have strong blood supplies going to them so they scar before they heal. A pianist with scarred tendons will feel sharp pain as they move. That is the scar tissue tearing. The good news is that this can easily be healed with massage therapy and proper technique. Proper movement promotes healing.
If you tear muscle, muscle tissue can heal overnight or in a few days as muscles have an ample supply of oxygenated blood flowing to them.
People think the more they work out the more endurance they are building. Actually that isn't true. They are actually improving their economy of motion. Movement doesn't become easier because of endurance, the body is just becoming more efficient at that particular movement. Your body is requiring less strength and oxygen than you did prior.
Have you ever watched "Dancing With The Stars" and witness professional athletes and body builders who have no endurance? They not only come off the dance floor exhausted but all that muscle robs them of flexibility and true endurance as the muscle mass is starved for oxygenated blood. The body has to move all that weight and the large muscles get in the way of joint flexibility. I've even witnessed long distance runners get winded riding a bike. Why is that? They trained and isolated specific muscles rather than full body training. The muscles used to run are different than those used to ride a bike. That is why ballet dancers can do most everything with ease. Some astute football coaches even encourage their players to take ballet. People who have trained in a certain way generally have equal and opposite weaknesses equivalent to their strengths. Pianists are no expectation. Train for strength and you will be weak. Train to the laws of physics and you will play effortless - which is not the same as "strong."
Sharp pain and fatigue are not good symptoms to have. They indicate that you are doing something wrong. Any time you feel those two symptoms you should stop and not continue until you figure out what is wrong with the movement. Otherwise permanent damage may occur. If your car is giving you problems, continuing to drive won't make the problem go away, the problem will only get worse and become more expensive to repair. Remember the old adage that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Live it or pay later.
What about people who exercise for weight management? The simple truth is, in order to lose weight (or burn fat - which is not the same thing since exercising to build muscle can put on weight in numbers even if you lose fat. A mirror is a better judge than the scale), you need to burn off more calories than you consume. If you eat more calories than you burn off, no matter how much you exercise, you won't lose anything.
The good news is that muscle by its mere existence burns fat without you having to do anything. One pound of fat can fuel the body for up to 10 hours of continuous activity. But most people can't and shouldn't go 10 hours without eating. Beside the amount you eat, what you eat is very important. Complex carbs, protein, vegetables and lots of water will build muscle and burn calories. Sugar and simple carbs that turn to sugar will not burn fat. You're burning the sugar and storing the leftover as fat.
I'm not a doctor but I have been injured. I've also been lucky to know people without PhD's who taught me to heal myself. Some of them didn't even have high school diplomas and they could do what no doctor could. Because of them, getting injured was the best thing to ever happen to me. If you are lucky, you'll never get injured but, getting injured might save you from technical and professional mediocrity if you have the capacity to heal. Consider Gandhi, failing the bar exam saved him from a life of professional oblivion. Failing isn't so bad, it is what you do with it that makes all the difference.
Sunday, August 3, 2014
Gaga Over The Church
While answering the phones for a suicide hotline, not a day would go by
that I didn't receive one to six calls from suicidal teens, many of them
citing sexual orientation as the source of their pain, confusion and
suffering.
Homosexuality is no longer an issue in mainstream society. Other than the church, most people are accepting and blind to the issue. It is even accepted among teens themselves. On a recent trip to Provincetown, MA, a town known to be a haven for homosexual people, half the tourists were breeders and many of them brought their small children with them. Homosexuality wasn't even something that needed to be tolerated, it just was. Indeed, within this small town, the lion lays down with the lamb and the child plays at the den of the cobra. I just wasn't sure who the lions or lambs were. It didn't matter. Persecuted and persecutors, no more.
Some of my gay teen callers are sometimes threatened and bullied in school and it is usually because they are in the closet and the bullies are trying to elicit a response from them. For the kid who is openly gay, a bully can't hold anything over them and tends to leave them alone. The kid who is out also tends to have support from other kids who can see the value in them and appreciate their honesty. It has been my lifetime observation that in five or ten years, homophobic bullies eventually come out of the closet themselves as their bullying was really the exploration of their own sexuality and boundaries. They are more to be pitied than censured.
Predominately, having found acceptance by their peers, my gay callers are more alienated by their parents or by the teachings of the church than peers. Since the Westboro Church has taught us that God hates, and He hates gays most of all, it is no wonder that a teen struggling with his identity can feel alone, abandoned, forgotten, hated and ostracized. If even God hates you, who could be for you?
Back in biblical days, the life expectancy of an adult was thirty or forty years of age and further complicating matters, most children died before their tenth birth-date due to disease or illness. If there was a famine, food was given to adults before being given to a child because the chance of a child making it to adulthood was slim and feeding them was considered to be a waste of resources.
Anyone who partook in homosexual practices or committed "the sin of Onan" (masturbation), was participating in an act which wasted seed. Those activities did not produce offspring and in those days, for the good of the tribe or community, it was important for procreation to take precedent over self pleasure. It was also common practice for thirteen year old girls to be sold into marriage as soon as they hit puberty, in an effort for them to produce as many children as possible before they died at the ripe old age of thirty. A perfect example of this practice is Joseph who was about forty and Mary who was thirteen.
The church and society have long forgotten why homosexuality and masturbation was frowned upon but they still hold blindly on to those archaic prejudices today. According to the National Alliance on Mental Illness, nearly 5000 teens commit suicide each year and approximately 2 million U.S. teens attempt suicide.
Enter Lady Gaga (Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta). She is a marketing genius for using gimmicks, controversy and over the top behavior and costumes to build an estimated net worth of $190 million. What she does with those millions of dollars speaks volumes. Being the product of a Catholic school education, she knows the pain and anguish of being different, even in a Roman Catholic school setting - where she herself was bullied and teased. Because of the pain the church has inflicted upon her in her youth, the church has become a target in her her music and marketing genius.
Together with her mom, Lady Gaga created a foundation called "Born This Way" which is a non-profit organization founded in 2011. It has the support of Harvard University, the Berkman Center for Internet & Society, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the California Endowment. In September of 2012 Gaga was awarded the LennonOno Grant For Peace from Yoko Ono for her work with the foundation actively campaigning on pro-tolerance and peace issues.
The foundation aims to create a "braver, kinder world" for youth, to create safe-spaces, promote the learning of life skills, and provide opportunities to improve their local communities. Some priorities of the organization are teen suicide, bullying, homosexuality and school violence.
It appears that Lady Gaga has done much to save the lives of many teenagers struggling with sexual identity while the institutional church appears to be unconcerned for the loss of many. The score is Gaga: one; the institutional church: zero.
Lady Gaga teaches us the very valuable lesson that even the most ardent Puritan can learn, that acceptance does not make "wrong" right, it only makes what was "wrong," precious. Another lesson Gaga teaches us is that oppression breeds the power to oppose it and oppose it she has. She has used the church's own intolerance to challenge it to grow. Don't hate her when she blasts the church. Instead, ask why she is blasting the church. Maybe it is time for the church to fix something.
Ultimately, who cares what a hater thinks. I often try to get my callers to discover that the wrong person they'll never mean anything. To the right person, they'll mean everything. Thank you Lady Gaga for making my job answering the suicide hotline much easier. To any church of intolerance, I'll pray for you.
There are many churches who are gay accepting and they proudly wave the rainbow flag but, the gay community doesn't want their own church. They just want to be part of everyday society. We don't see signs at restaurants advertising "Blacks welcome here" or, "Woman may use front entrance." Why do we need flags and signs advertising acceptance? It should just be. Isn't "Come, all are welcome," enough?
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (NSPL)
Call 24/7
1-800-273-8255
"To understand blue, first you have to understand yellow and orange. In other words, in order to really understand anything you have to understand its opposite."
-Vincent Van Gogh
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quXq65p7YD4
Homosexuality is no longer an issue in mainstream society. Other than the church, most people are accepting and blind to the issue. It is even accepted among teens themselves. On a recent trip to Provincetown, MA, a town known to be a haven for homosexual people, half the tourists were breeders and many of them brought their small children with them. Homosexuality wasn't even something that needed to be tolerated, it just was. Indeed, within this small town, the lion lays down with the lamb and the child plays at the den of the cobra. I just wasn't sure who the lions or lambs were. It didn't matter. Persecuted and persecutors, no more.
Some of my gay teen callers are sometimes threatened and bullied in school and it is usually because they are in the closet and the bullies are trying to elicit a response from them. For the kid who is openly gay, a bully can't hold anything over them and tends to leave them alone. The kid who is out also tends to have support from other kids who can see the value in them and appreciate their honesty. It has been my lifetime observation that in five or ten years, homophobic bullies eventually come out of the closet themselves as their bullying was really the exploration of their own sexuality and boundaries. They are more to be pitied than censured.
Predominately, having found acceptance by their peers, my gay callers are more alienated by their parents or by the teachings of the church than peers. Since the Westboro Church has taught us that God hates, and He hates gays most of all, it is no wonder that a teen struggling with his identity can feel alone, abandoned, forgotten, hated and ostracized. If even God hates you, who could be for you?
Back in biblical days, the life expectancy of an adult was thirty or forty years of age and further complicating matters, most children died before their tenth birth-date due to disease or illness. If there was a famine, food was given to adults before being given to a child because the chance of a child making it to adulthood was slim and feeding them was considered to be a waste of resources.
Anyone who partook in homosexual practices or committed "the sin of Onan" (masturbation), was participating in an act which wasted seed. Those activities did not produce offspring and in those days, for the good of the tribe or community, it was important for procreation to take precedent over self pleasure. It was also common practice for thirteen year old girls to be sold into marriage as soon as they hit puberty, in an effort for them to produce as many children as possible before they died at the ripe old age of thirty. A perfect example of this practice is Joseph who was about forty and Mary who was thirteen.
The church and society have long forgotten why homosexuality and masturbation was frowned upon but they still hold blindly on to those archaic prejudices today. According to the National Alliance on Mental Illness, nearly 5000 teens commit suicide each year and approximately 2 million U.S. teens attempt suicide.
Enter Lady Gaga (Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta). She is a marketing genius for using gimmicks, controversy and over the top behavior and costumes to build an estimated net worth of $190 million. What she does with those millions of dollars speaks volumes. Being the product of a Catholic school education, she knows the pain and anguish of being different, even in a Roman Catholic school setting - where she herself was bullied and teased. Because of the pain the church has inflicted upon her in her youth, the church has become a target in her her music and marketing genius.
Together with her mom, Lady Gaga created a foundation called "Born This Way" which is a non-profit organization founded in 2011. It has the support of Harvard University, the Berkman Center for Internet & Society, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the California Endowment. In September of 2012 Gaga was awarded the LennonOno Grant For Peace from Yoko Ono for her work with the foundation actively campaigning on pro-tolerance and peace issues.
The foundation aims to create a "braver, kinder world" for youth, to create safe-spaces, promote the learning of life skills, and provide opportunities to improve their local communities. Some priorities of the organization are teen suicide, bullying, homosexuality and school violence.
It appears that Lady Gaga has done much to save the lives of many teenagers struggling with sexual identity while the institutional church appears to be unconcerned for the loss of many. The score is Gaga: one; the institutional church: zero.
Lady Gaga teaches us the very valuable lesson that even the most ardent Puritan can learn, that acceptance does not make "wrong" right, it only makes what was "wrong," precious. Another lesson Gaga teaches us is that oppression breeds the power to oppose it and oppose it she has. She has used the church's own intolerance to challenge it to grow. Don't hate her when she blasts the church. Instead, ask why she is blasting the church. Maybe it is time for the church to fix something.
Ultimately, who cares what a hater thinks. I often try to get my callers to discover that the wrong person they'll never mean anything. To the right person, they'll mean everything. Thank you Lady Gaga for making my job answering the suicide hotline much easier. To any church of intolerance, I'll pray for you.
There are many churches who are gay accepting and they proudly wave the rainbow flag but, the gay community doesn't want their own church. They just want to be part of everyday society. We don't see signs at restaurants advertising "Blacks welcome here" or, "Woman may use front entrance." Why do we need flags and signs advertising acceptance? It should just be. Isn't "Come, all are welcome," enough?
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (NSPL)
Call 24/7
1-800-273-8255
"To understand blue, first you have to understand yellow and orange. In other words, in order to really understand anything you have to understand its opposite."
-Vincent Van Gogh
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quXq65p7YD4
Labels:
church,
gay,
homosexuality,
hotline,
lady gaga,
malcolm kogut,
sex,
suicide,
teen
Friday, August 1, 2014
Thursday, July 31, 2014
Anything Goes with Bonnie
Bonnie is 94 years old and used to be a professional dancer. She was
recently struck by a car, fracturing her sternum. This is the first
time she has performed in six months.
Friday, July 18, 2014
Charlie Haden (The First and Last)
(August 6, 1937 – July 11, 2014)
This is a recording of bass player jazz great Charlie Haden when he was two years old singing on his father's country radio show. Charlie continued to sing on the show but at the age of 15 he contracted polio and lost use of his vocal cords. He didn't sing publicly again until he was 70. Here is the second and final vocal recording he made.
While on a world tour, Haden refused to perform in Portugal because of the country's politics and human rights violations. He was coerced to perform by the band leader because he was under contract. Out of protest, he dedicated one of his songs to the Black Liberation Movement in Mozambique, Angola and Guinea-Bissau. The crowd of over 20,000 people, mostly students, went wild with cheering. Later, before boarding his plane at the airport, Charlie was arrested and taken into custody. The US Embassy refused to help him because the US government was embarrassed about his comments. He was eventually released. Twenty years later after Portugal was under new leadership, he was invited back to perform. Upon walking on stage, the crowd of 40,000 began chanting his name over and over. No prophet is recognized in his own country.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)