Senator Chuck Schumer is at it again. Whenever something happens in the
world somehow Mr. Schumer will find a way to propose a law about it.
For instance, last month when a Malaysia Airline was shot down over the
Ukraine, Schumer suggested that we equip our commercial airlines with
anti-missile defenses so that an event like that doesn't happen here.
Remember when Avonte Oquendo, the boy with autism whose remains were
found after he disappeared at age 14 from his school in October?
Senator Schumer proposed “Avonte’s Law,” which would place electronic
tracking devices to be worn by children with autism. My sister raised
an autistic child and never lost her once. That was just good
parenting. My own mom had a lucrative career building bombs while
working at the arsenal. When she had her first child she quit to become
a stay at home mom. We may not have had two cars and steak for dinner
every night but no new legislation was required for my mom to raise four
kids.
This weeks Schumerian target are those ubiquitous
wristband fitness devices. There are dozens of them on the market and
Senator Schumer has targeted Fitbit. He claims that these wrist
pedometers are a "privacy nightmare" and that they collect personal
information on your health, sleep, and location - information which
should be just that – personal. Without doing his research, Schumer
opined that Fitbit will sell your personal information. Fitbit
responded with; "Fitbit does not sell user data. Our privacy policy
prevents us from doing this. We are committed to our users' privacy and
welcome the opportunity to work with Senator Schumer on this important
issue." Alas, it is too late for Fitbit. Just google "privacy
nightmare." I wonder why Schumer didn't target other giants of the
industry such as Nike or Garmin.
Most users of these fitness
devices eagerly and willingly register these tools and freely upload
their information for the world to see. Personally, I would register
the device under a fake name for I don't want the world to see how lazy I
am. Actually, I am not lazy but as a piano player, I spend much of my
time sitting lifelessly at either the piano or computer. I also spend
an enormous amount of time practicing away from the piano either on my
sofa or in a deck chair by the pool. You may think that I'm napping but
in reality I am working very studiously at composing, memorization and
improvising.
If Mr. Schumer is truly concerned about our
privacy, especially the personal information many of us freely post
about ourselves, maybe he should look into Facebook.
When I was a
kid I had a neighbor who was always looking out her window watching us
kids play. I would look over to her house to see the curtains rustle as
she hid from view. In college, every kid in the dorm practiced the art
of voyeurism. A friend of mine admitted that she was always watching
the man next door and it bothered her conscience when she was caught
lustily watching him.
If we knew someone was stalking us and
gathering information on us, it would certainly creep us out. Our
personal information is none of their business. So how come we are
accepting of people using Facebook to cyberstalk us? The answer is
simple; we do it to other people ourselves.
Facebook serves as a
covert method of investigation and discovering a wealth of information
about people we don't actually know. Every time we meet someone new,
one of the first things we will do is look them up on Facebook in order
to learn everything about them and even "friend" them to get more. We
want to know who their parents and siblings are, what they have been up
to lately, where they live, where they vacation, who their friends are,
where they work, how old they are, who they are they dating, status
updates, photo uploads, photo tags, photo comments, wall posts, friend
additions, group memberships, attended events, mutual friends, where
they may have commented and what they "like." Facebook doesn't have the
physical elements of being stalked in the real world, such as being
followed or watched but the ulterior motive is just the same and just as
real.
Online stalking may also consist of people communicating
with you in ways that unsettle you (whether purposefully intended or
unknowingly), especially with respect to suggesting or implying that
they're watching and noting your every comment and update. Peter
Baterip was accused of stalking an ex girlfriend and contacting her on
Facebook using a fake identity over the course of 18 months. There have
been numerous stories of teens (and adults posing as teens) who bully
and harass people to the point of the victims even completing suicide in
some cases. Many employers take to Facebook to gather information
about their employees. One local man was fired from his job when he
called in sick but later posted a selfie of himself at a baseball game
on Facebook. His boss was one of his "friends." There was a Roman
Catholic priest in TX who was accused of Facebook stalking. There was
nothing wrong with that except all his stalkees were teenage boys in his
parish. Without committing a crime, he was removed from active
ministry.
Facebook stalking, like regular stalking, allows the
stalker to secretly gather information about the person they are
interested in. Facebook stalking is less likely to have an illegal
component and is generally accepted by it's voyeuristic victims. The
argument being, that if you didn't want others to know about your life,
you wouldn't post it all over the internet. But, the real reason is
that - we all do it and don't feel we are being voyeuristic about it.
That's actually called denial. Maybe we are not willing to look into
the abyss because we are afraid what will be staring back at us. I don't know, does the shoe fit?
Have
you ever searched Facebook for someone you dated like fifteen years
ago? Have you ever searched Facebook for high school friends to see who
aged better, or who has the better job, who went bald, who got fat or
who married whom? Stalking has become a perfectly normal activity. So
you searched an ex-lover or new acquaintance on Facebook, who cares?
If a neighbor watches you out his window or takes a photo of you, why is
that different or worse?
Does Schumer know about Facebook
stalking? Sure he does but no one will ever do anything about it
because we all do it, so that makes it okay. After it was discovered
that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was the Boston Bomber, his Facebook page
received millions of hits within hours before it was taken down. But,
not before people took snapshots of his pages and downloaded all the
data. Nothing creepy about that. Do you want to see his pages? Sure
you do. Just go to Google Images and search "Dzhokhar Tsarnaev facebook
page." Want to see who his friends are? Sure you do. Want to see him
shirtless? Sure you do. Nothing creepy here because, *you* are doing
it and not some creepy person or organization you don't know, such as
Fitbit. Unlike Fitbit, I wonder if Facebook sells your personal
information . . . ? Does Schumer know about this?
PS, if you
are lonely or bored, turn off Facebook and go outside to meet real
people. A high-five is much healthier than a poke. A real friend is
much more healthier than a "friend."
No comments:
Post a Comment