A few decades ago the American Health Association published a report
proclaiming that there was a drastic increase in neck injuries and
whiplash. I was a passenger in a car and the driver turned his head to
the left to look for oncoming traffic. Somehow he hurt his neck. He
pulled over and I drove him to the hospital where the doctor told him
that he had whiplash. So what is the cause for all these new neck
injuries? I blame the legislature. To understand the answer, we should
first consider the elephant.
My mother grew up in a traveling
circus and she told me how they would tie a rope around the leg of an
elephant and then tie the other end off onto anything. A fence, a pole,
a traffic cone, a bike, a bale of hay or a simple post in the ground.
The elephant would think that he was tied up so he would not attempt to
go anywhere. The horses were the same. Just drape their reins over a
fence and that is where they would remain because in their minds, they
were tied up. Despite the fact that the elephant could probably drag a
Hummer behind him, he didn't try to go anywhere because in his mind he
knew he couldn't.
When New York State passed a seat belt law,
the same psychological effect which tethered the elephant in its place
also affected people in the same sort of way. People began to move
incorrectly or, failed to move correctly. The seat belt wasn't
hampering ergonomic movement but psychologically, it was hampering
ergonomic movement. So how are we supposed to turn our heads even with
an innocuous seat belt on?
The body is designed to work most
efficiently in its mid range of motion. Just because you can move a
certain way, doesn't mean you should. At least not repetitively and not
to the extreme. Since every part of the body is connected to every
other part of the body (The knee bone's connected to the - hip bone.
The hip bone's connected to the . . .), our body parts are designed to
work sympathetically.
Don't do this, but from a sitting
position, turn your head as far back as you can. Make note of how far
you can actually go. You can mark your spot by picking an object to look
at. You probably only turned your head approximately 90 degrees. If
you moved to your extreme range of motion, you probably felt discomfort,
pain or gave yourself whiplash.
Now, working with your
shoulders, stomach muscles and hips; turn from your hips, then add the
shoulders, then the neck and you should be able to see about 180 degrees
or, almost directly behind you. Keep in mind that every motion has an
equal and opposite motion. While turning, if you were turning to your
left, as your right shoulder moves forward, your left shoulder must also
pivot backward. Don't anchor it. That sympathetic movement should be
natural for most people but it isn't. Whenever you isolate any part of
the body, you run the risk of injuring a sympathetic part. If your
right and left shoulders don't work together in the turn, you will not
be able to turn as far, or, you run the risk of straining something.
Now,
stand up and add the knees and ankles to that mix. If you were looking
to the left, keep your left foot anchored flat to the floor and pivot
on your right toe. You can probably see at a 270 degree angle by
turning and using all your body parts (of course, you could just turn
your head to the right).
All those movements as I dictated
probably have you moving at your extreme ranges of motion. You should
only turn you neck about 40 degrees, then your hips aiding you to about
90, then your shoulders about 130, and your ankles and knees to about
170. Your eyes can do the rest.
Because we are all forced to
wear a seat belt, some of us let our brains trick us into thinking we
can't move so we only look with our necks when in reality, while sitting
in a car, we can still pivot with our hips and shoulders while
driving. I have also noticed that because of this seat belt phenomenon,
many drivers are not turning to look but relying solely on their
mirrors for looking behind them. In many instances, this is less safe
than actually turning our heads and looking. Even our laws and
legislation can have equal and opposite reactions. Seat belts may save
lives, but by stifling good driving habits, they could take lives, also.
By working on full body motion, one can mitigate or palliate
the pain and lack of motion due to arthritis, stiffness or tendonitis.
In a few days I will talk about preventing and curing median nerve
entrapment (carpal tunnel syndrome) and tendonitis by teaching you how
to ring a doorbell. Most of us do that incorrectly, too.
-Malcolm Kogut.
Musician Malcolm Kogut has been tickling the ivories since he was 14 and won the NPM DMMD Musician of the Year award in 99. He has CDs along with many published books. Malcolm played in the pit for many Broadway touring shows. When away from the keyboard, he loves exploring the nooks, crannies and arresting beauty of the Adirondack Mountains, battling gravity on the ski slopes and roller coasters.
Showing posts with label driving. Show all posts
Showing posts with label driving. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 29, 2013
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Texting Laws
A man on the street was bent over searching for something on the ground when a passerby approached and asked him what he was doing;
"Looking for my car keys."
the slumped seeker sighed.
"Where did you lose them?"
the passerby piqued.
The hunched over man replied with a dismissive head gesture,
"Across the Street."
"Then why are you looking over here?"
the passerby queried.
The car key seeker said,
"The light is better over here."
That is what a lot of the laws which congress passes are like. They are useless feel good legislation which don't really do anything. They seek solutions to problems and issues but in the wrong place. It does however make the sponsors of the light-seeking-law look good when it comes time for re-election but that's about it. Governor Cuomo (D) of NY recently came under fire from Conservative Party Chairman Mike Long because Cuomo passed a gun law which does nothing to protect people but does further his political career. A lot of these laws bring in barrels of money via fines and tickets and police departments may even receive grant money for new toys, computers and staff - which is all good for the town coffers.
The city of Troy in NY purchased a computerized gun shot triangulation system to pinpoint the approximate location of where a gun is fired from anywhere in the city. They discovered that a 911 call does the same. This system was paid for through grant money and tax payers. It hasn't deterred crime. It only taught the criminal that they need to leave the scene faster. That system is now for sale. I bet you can buy it from them cheap.
Murder is against the law but people still do it. Smoking marijuana is against the law but people still do it. Cheating on taxes is against the law but people still do it. Eighteen year old adult high school senior students who have sex with their sixteen year old infant high school sweethearts is against the law but these hormone enraged pedophiles still do it. Drinking and driving is against the law but people still do it. Texting while driving is against the law but people still do it. The no-texting law is one such law which I beleive has made society and our roads less safe - because people still do it - only now, less safe.
A friend asked me to ride with her to the mall because she needed help getting supplies for a birthday party she was hosting. While driving, she rummaged through her purse and pulled out her cell phone, placed it on her knee, then began typing one letter at a time. I asked her what she was doing and she said that she was posting a status update on Facebook to let everyone know where she was. I told her that texting while driving was against the law but she said that she would be careful. We eventually got there and made it safely home in one piece despite two more texts and the attendant reading of the replies which began filtering in almost immediately. I thought to myself - what are these people doing reading Facebook? Why aren't they out living REAL life for themselves?
When I used to text while driving, I would hold my phone up over the steering wheel so that I could see both the road and the phone at the same time. This was even more safe than using a GPS which was positioned less in my line of vision, or even more safe than looking down to change a radio station. Texting laws are making our roads less safe because people don't want to risk getting a ticket so, they are texting in their lap rather than texting more safely in sight of the road.
Of course texting while driving is not safe at all and people should employ common sense and respect for other drivers by NOT DOING IT. I'm not worried about me getting in an accident, I'm more worried about the other driver getting me into an accident. Surely, any text that is so important that it must be fired off at that particular moment is worth pulling over to do properly and safely. You don't want your last Facebook update to be "Traffic is horrendous tod . . ."
Programming the GPS, adjusting the raido, putting on makeup, flossing teeth, eating or even talking to someone in the passenger seat can be equally distracting. It all really depends on each individual and their multi-tasking skills but even so, if the law isn't doing anything but making the roads more dangerous, what can be done? Pass more laws? Increase the prison time for Facebook updaters? Ban Facebook? Make it a law that you have to text in front of the steering wheel?
Enter WRGB, channel six; Each morning during the news they run PSA's about texting and how dangerous it can be. They list the statistics of how many deaths there have been during the past year because of texting; How many accidents; How many feet you will not be in control of your vehicle should you look down for a moment; How many children were killed because of texting parents; How much it costs the insurance companies which is then passed down to everyone else.
The greatest public service WRGB has provided is that they have asked viewers to take a "No Texting Pledge" at the WRGB website. I haven't formally taken the pledge but their ads have awakened me into being a more safe driver. I bet their announcements, ads and pledge campaign have prevented more accidents than the laws have. I'm also willing to bet that the law has caused more accidents from people trying not to get caught and ticketed because they are texting more surreptitiously and dangerously in their laps.
When given the choice between educating people so that they change their habits or, passing a law which many people will try to evade for whatever reason, I am sure that more people would say that education is a more powerful tool. But then, if not passing feel-good-legislation, what would our elected officials do with their free time?
"Looking for my car keys."
the slumped seeker sighed.
"Where did you lose them?"
the passerby piqued.
The hunched over man replied with a dismissive head gesture,
"Across the Street."
"Then why are you looking over here?"
the passerby queried.
The car key seeker said,
"The light is better over here."
That is what a lot of the laws which congress passes are like. They are useless feel good legislation which don't really do anything. They seek solutions to problems and issues but in the wrong place. It does however make the sponsors of the light-seeking-law look good when it comes time for re-election but that's about it. Governor Cuomo (D) of NY recently came under fire from Conservative Party Chairman Mike Long because Cuomo passed a gun law which does nothing to protect people but does further his political career. A lot of these laws bring in barrels of money via fines and tickets and police departments may even receive grant money for new toys, computers and staff - which is all good for the town coffers.
The city of Troy in NY purchased a computerized gun shot triangulation system to pinpoint the approximate location of where a gun is fired from anywhere in the city. They discovered that a 911 call does the same. This system was paid for through grant money and tax payers. It hasn't deterred crime. It only taught the criminal that they need to leave the scene faster. That system is now for sale. I bet you can buy it from them cheap.
Murder is against the law but people still do it. Smoking marijuana is against the law but people still do it. Cheating on taxes is against the law but people still do it. Eighteen year old adult high school senior students who have sex with their sixteen year old infant high school sweethearts is against the law but these hormone enraged pedophiles still do it. Drinking and driving is against the law but people still do it. Texting while driving is against the law but people still do it. The no-texting law is one such law which I beleive has made society and our roads less safe - because people still do it - only now, less safe.
A friend asked me to ride with her to the mall because she needed help getting supplies for a birthday party she was hosting. While driving, she rummaged through her purse and pulled out her cell phone, placed it on her knee, then began typing one letter at a time. I asked her what she was doing and she said that she was posting a status update on Facebook to let everyone know where she was. I told her that texting while driving was against the law but she said that she would be careful. We eventually got there and made it safely home in one piece despite two more texts and the attendant reading of the replies which began filtering in almost immediately. I thought to myself - what are these people doing reading Facebook? Why aren't they out living REAL life for themselves?
When I used to text while driving, I would hold my phone up over the steering wheel so that I could see both the road and the phone at the same time. This was even more safe than using a GPS which was positioned less in my line of vision, or even more safe than looking down to change a radio station. Texting laws are making our roads less safe because people don't want to risk getting a ticket so, they are texting in their lap rather than texting more safely in sight of the road.
Of course texting while driving is not safe at all and people should employ common sense and respect for other drivers by NOT DOING IT. I'm not worried about me getting in an accident, I'm more worried about the other driver getting me into an accident. Surely, any text that is so important that it must be fired off at that particular moment is worth pulling over to do properly and safely. You don't want your last Facebook update to be "Traffic is horrendous tod . . ."
Programming the GPS, adjusting the raido, putting on makeup, flossing teeth, eating or even talking to someone in the passenger seat can be equally distracting. It all really depends on each individual and their multi-tasking skills but even so, if the law isn't doing anything but making the roads more dangerous, what can be done? Pass more laws? Increase the prison time for Facebook updaters? Ban Facebook? Make it a law that you have to text in front of the steering wheel?
Enter WRGB, channel six; Each morning during the news they run PSA's about texting and how dangerous it can be. They list the statistics of how many deaths there have been during the past year because of texting; How many accidents; How many feet you will not be in control of your vehicle should you look down for a moment; How many children were killed because of texting parents; How much it costs the insurance companies which is then passed down to everyone else.
The greatest public service WRGB has provided is that they have asked viewers to take a "No Texting Pledge" at the WRGB website. I haven't formally taken the pledge but their ads have awakened me into being a more safe driver. I bet their announcements, ads and pledge campaign have prevented more accidents than the laws have. I'm also willing to bet that the law has caused more accidents from people trying not to get caught and ticketed because they are texting more surreptitiously and dangerously in their laps.
When given the choice between educating people so that they change their habits or, passing a law which many people will try to evade for whatever reason, I am sure that more people would say that education is a more powerful tool. But then, if not passing feel-good-legislation, what would our elected officials do with their free time?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)