I was raised in an age where we were
taught to stop, look and listen, then look again and continue to look
both ways while crossing. I don't quite understand the logic of a slow
moving flesh and blood pedestrian having the right of way over two tons
of steel and velocity. Even today I have no desire to take up the
practice of challenging a 4,000 pound vehicle against my unprotected
body. Even if a driver of a vehicle slows down, I wave them by because
that driver may recognize my authority over him but that doesn't
guarantee other drivers, as in this case, are cognizant of my ability to
part a sea of vehicles in my path.
When I was a
teen on a bike, I witnessed a pedestrian stepping onto a street forcing a
car to come to a stop. As she approached the other lane, a car across
the street was pulling out of a side street and he was looking to his
left for oncoming traffic. There was none coming and no need to look to
the right since it was his lane he was turning onto. As he pulled onto the street and looked to the right, it was too late. Compound leg fractures ensued. The car was fine.
I
walk at about 2.5 miles per hour and a car can be going about 30 miles
per hour on the average city street (c'mon, who are we kidding - 40).
At my pace I can stop in about a foot. A car may take several feet to
stop. If someone steps in front of a car, several feet may not be
enough. The law may be on the side of the pedestrian but the laws of physics is not.
Residents
of the community are very upset about this recent hit and are demanding
that the city do something to make this busy vehicular intersection
more safe, at taxpayer expense. Good parenting is free.
No
pedestrian should suddenly leave a curb or other place of safety and
walk in the path of a moving vehicle which constitutes an immediate
hazard. You may disagree but I think that that is just insane
regardless what the law says. So parents, decide what you teach your
children: Stop, look and listen or, stop traffic. BTW, where is your ten year old at nine p.m.?