I've
been researching wearable trackers and have been looking at three
products which all boast the same relative features: Fenix 3HR ($479),
TomTom Adventurer ($349) and the Amazfit Pace ($159). You can find a 20%
or 30% discount on retailmenot.com for the Pace. The Amazfit is new on
the market. It premiered in China mid 2016 and in the USA on January
of 2017. I was interested in the Pace because of it's price.
Especially if it did everything I wanted and at a third of the price
with a discount. There is a lot of misinformation about the Amazfit
Pace online, I suspect because it is still new or its competitors are
trolling it. Here is some of the incorrect data out there;
"It is only in Chinese" - only if you purchase the Chinese version. Buy the USA version (Pace) if you want it in English.
"It is only in metric." The Pace is in Imperial.
"It
is only in military time." Some of its native clock faces are in 24
hour time, others are in 12 hour time. There are 13 faces to choose
from and it is too bad they can not be customized or utilize third party
apps. Maybe they will change this in the future with an update.
"It
does not have breadcrumbing or altitude features." It does. When you
begin a workout, you can choose from RUN, WALK, INDOOR RUN or TRAIL
RUN. I beleive the altitude gauge only displays in TRAIL RUN mode.
Breadcrumb is also in TRAIL RUN, you just have to scroll to the bottom
screen for it.
I have two friends, one
with the Fenix 3 and the other with Ambit 3. Then next time we go hiking
together, I will do a more detailed comparison. For now, I performed a
simple test of the Amazfit Pace, my Garmin Vivofit and the Android app
Map My Hike. Here is the comparison data. I walked two blocks in an
area surrounded by houses and trees.
Heart Rate: The Pace utilizes a PPG heart rate sensor while my Vivofit uses an ECG heart rate chest strap sensor. ECG is regarded to be more accurate while PPG is good for averages.
First check: Pace 73, Vivofit 70, my finger 68. My peak heart rate was listed: Pace 156, Vivofit 108.
First check: Pace 73, Vivofit 70, my finger 68. My peak heart rate was listed: Pace 156, Vivofit 108.
Steps: Pace 967, Garmin 989.
Maximum speed: Pace 4.14 mph, Map My Hike: 4.1 mph
Calories burned: Pace 36, Map My Hike 56, Garmin 46.
Mileage:
Pace .43 miles, Map My Hike .43 (I forgot to mark my Garmin but it is
not GPS and I'm sure would be a little more based upon more steps).
Sleep.
Neither is particularly accurate because I watched an hour of TV in bed
before going to sleep and watched about an hour when I woke up.
Deep sleep: Pace 2 hours and 21 minutes. Garmin 4 hours and 42 minutes.
Total sleep: Pace 8:39, Garmin 9:09
As
you can see from the attached pictures, neither my phone nor the Pace
were very accurate but, I will blame that on the houses and trees.
Maybe I need to recalibrate both or walk faster. Both were very
accurate when I tested them while driving. The Pace tracks both Russian
(GLONASS) and USA satellites and picks them up very fast.
The
third photo is of the GPS tracking feature. In some wearables, this is
called "Breadcrumb." For me, this is a valuable feature because I
wander off trail sometimes and using this "map," it will help me find my
way back.
It is also worth noting that
one can get the Noom Walk app for a pedometer, Map My Hike for mapping
and Altitude for a compass and just use your phone for the same relative
data.
Who knows which one of these tools
are the most accurate. If you use them to relatively and consistently
track your own data, you can get a good measure of your activities and
metrics.
A mark of a good company is that they give
ownership of their product to their customers and clients. I hope Huami
Amazfit will make their product available to third parties so that
customers can customize their own workout metrics, watch faces and app
export. Right now the Pace only works with Strava.
I
don't like how the Pace is propitiatory to a phone and does not work on
its own. Once activated though, you don't need to carry the phone
around and, the pairing was a little confusing and not at all like the
demo videos online.
The transflective screen is excellent outside in the sunlight. Not so much indoors.
No comments:
Post a Comment